Most charities are good at describing
problems they hope can be solved with your donation and support.
One describes the dangers faced by very
young children and implies that these hazards can be stopped. Full stop.
Another tells you of the third world children forced to drink contaminated
water. A leading wildlife charity describes the plight of the snow leopard and
implies that adopting one of these beautiful endangered creatures will somehow
protect it.
Most will talk about their achievements on
their website, but few do in the advertisements and advertisements are what
potential donors see first.
It is however important to be realistic in
your claims. Can children really be protected when a lot of abuse takes place
in the home?
And what can be done about the number of
cases in the UK of children used in sex trafficking?
Writing in the Sunday Times, Jonathan Leake
and Ross Clark tell readers how to save the world’s most endangered animals.
Their five point strategy involves fighting the poachers, blocking the trade at
the borders, educating people, particularly the Chinese of the damage done when
they buy these products, incentivising local villagers to look after their
wildlife, encouraging tourism, and a captive breeding programme for wildlife
parks.
Human encroachment and loss of habitat also
speed the process of extinction for beautiful endangered species. Few of these
basic problems can be solved by Charities.
So don't make unrealistic claims. All they do is make the case for the cynics.
So don't make unrealistic claims. All they do is make the case for the cynics.
